Discussion:
Trump/Russia collusion: not proved
(too old to reply)
Chevy sux
2023-06-22 08:23:28 UTC
Permalink
https://www.politico.eu/article/mueller-refutes-trumps-no-collusion-no-
obstruction-line/
Mueller said there *was* collusion, but no crime.
We didn't need Mueller to tell us that.
Mr. B1ack
2023-06-22 14:34:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chevy sux
https://www.politico.eu/article/mueller-refutes-trumps-no-collusion-no-
obstruction-line/
Mueller said there *was* collusion, but no crime.
We didn't need Mueller to tell us that.
It reinforced what we all knew.
Scout
2023-06-22 15:15:17 UTC
Permalink
https://www.politico.eu/article/mueller-refutes-trumps-no-collusion-no-
obstruction-line/
Mueller said there *was* collusion, but no crime.
Well technically ALL non-public diplomacy and diplomatic actions involve
collusion or attempts at collusion.

Well else do you think it was CLASSIFIED? It was secret.

After all, why else do you think the committee had to discuss the matter in
the SCIF?

In fact, it would be just as valid to say the impeachment hearing in the
SCIF was collusion.
Rudy Canoza
2023-06-22 15:50:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
https://www.politico.eu/article/mueller-refutes-trumps-no-collusion-no-
obstruction-line/
Mueller said there *was* collusion, but no crime.
Well
scooter *always* starts *every* sentence with meaningless superfluous wheeze:
"Well...", "After all...", "In fact..."
Post by Scout
technically ALL non-public diplomacy and diplomatic actions involve
collusion or attempts at collusion.
Bullshit, scooter. You are giving "collusion" a different meaning than everyone
understands it to have. As used in the true statement "Trump and Russia engaged
in collusion in 2016," the word *always* means to pursue some illicit, nefarious
and *wrong* goal, and always in secret. That's what it means, scooter. The UK
and France *cooperated* to build the channel tunnel, scooter; they did not
"collude" to build it. Diplomatic negotiations might be conducted in secret,
but the goal isn't necessarily illicit.

Fuck off.
Post by Scout
Well [sic] else do you think it was CLASSIFIED? It was secret.
Trump collusion with Russia in pursuit of an illicit goal was not "classified,"
scooter.
Post by Scout
After all,
Empty wheeze.
Post by Scout
why else do you think the committee had to discuss the matter in the
SCIF?
The investigation into Trump's collusion with Russia was not conducted in a
SCIF, scooter, you fucking liar.
Post by Scout
In fact,
Empty wheeze.
Post by Scout
it would be just as valid to say the impeachment hearing in the SCIF
was collusion.
The impeachment hearing was not done in a SCIF, scooter, you fucking liar.
--
Canoza's law: *every* word scooter says is a lie
Loading...